Search for: "Cox v. Medical Device Business Services, Inc."
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Id. at 780.Sounds like a malpractice case, doesn't it.Well, a manufacturer's representative was present for the surgery - to make sure the device was "correctly calibrated" and "functioning properly" - a service that the defendant routinely provided. 851 N.E.2d at 781. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Jude Medical, Inc., 425 F.3d 1116, 1119-21 (8th Cir. 2005), and Castano v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Colleen V. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator Kim Carr… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
While opinions vary, everyone seems to agree that corporate boards need to bring a greater sense of urgency to address the growing business risk of cyber-attacks. [read post]
